Bosworth Care Home

What families say

What stands out here is the naturally friendly approach of the care team. Staff have been described as caring people with a genuine warmth that families notice during visits.

Based on 3 Google reviews · 0 reviews on carehome.co.uk · most recent 2026-04-10

The eight family priority themes

• Staff warmth65
• Compassion & dignity65
• Cleanliness65
• Activities & engagement60
• Food quality58
• Healthcare62
• Management & leadership70
• Resident happiness62

What inspectors found

Inspected 2019-02-23 · Report published 2019-02-23 · Inspected 2 times in the last three years

• Is this home safe?

  Good

  {"found":"The Safe domain was rated Good at the February 2019 inspection, representing an improvement from the previous Requires Improvement rating. This suggests that earlier concerns about safety u2014 which may have included staffing, medicines management or risk assessment u2014 had been addressed by the time of the most recent inspection. No specific safety incidents or concerns are described in the available published text. The home is registered for 20 beds, which is a small service where staffing ratios and individual risk awareness are particularly important. No information is available about night staffing numbers or agency staff reliance.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Good safety rating is the baseline your parent needs, and the improvement from Requires Improvement tells you that problems were identified and fixed u2014 that is how good care homes behave. However, our family review data shows that 14% of positive reviews specifically mention staff attentiveness, which speaks to consistent, watchful care throughout the day and night. Good Practice evidence highlights that safety tends to slip most at night, when staffing is thinnest. In a 20-bed home, even one staff member being unavailable can significantly change the ratio. Because the report does not give you night staffing numbers or agency usage figures, these are the two most important questions to ask directly.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research / Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that night staffing ratios are the single area where safety most commonly deteriorates in care homes, and that high agency staff reliance is associated with reduced consistency of care for people with dementia.","watch_out":"Ask the home: how many staff members are on duty overnight, and is there always at least one senior or experienced staff member present across the full night shift for all 20 beds?"}

  Verified by inspectorMentioned, not assessed

• Is the care effective?

  Good

  {"found":"The Effective domain was rated Good at the February 2019 inspection. This domain covers care planning, staff training, healthcare access and nutrition. The home lists dementia as a specialism, which means inspectors would have been looking at whether staff have appropriate dementia-specific training and whether care plans reflect individual needs. No specific details about training programmes, GP access arrangements, care plan content or food provision are included in the available report text. The improvement to Good suggests any earlier gaps in effectiveness had been resolved.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"For your parent with dementia, the Effective domain is where the practical quality of day-to-day care lives. Our family review data shows that 20.9% of positive reviews mention food quality specifically u2014 it is a reliable indicator of whether a home genuinely attends to individual preferences or takes a one-size-fits-all approach. Similarly, 12.7% of positive reviews reference dementia-specific care, suggesting families notice and value staff who understand the condition. The Good Practice evidence base is clear that care plans work best when they are treated as living documents, reviewed regularly with families, not filed away after admission. Because the report text does not tell us how often plans are reviewed or whether families are included, this is worth exploring directly.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett / IFF evidence review (2026) found that homes where care plans are actively co-produced with families and reviewed at least quarterly show better outcomes for residents with dementia, particularly in managing distress and maintaining routine.","watch_out":"Ask the home: how often is your parent's care plan formally reviewed, and will you be invited to those reviews or at least informed of any changes made?"}

  Verified by inspector

• Is this home caring?

  Good

  {"found":"The Caring domain was rated Good at the February 2019 inspection. This domain assesses whether staff treat residents with warmth, dignity and respect, and whether individuals are supported to maintain independence. No specific staff observations, resident quotes or examples of care interactions are available in the published report text. The overall Good rating suggests inspectors did not observe practices that fell below expected standards of kindness and respect. The home's previous Requires Improvement rating may have included caring concerns; the subsequent improvement to Good indicates these were addressed.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Staff warmth is the single most important theme in our family review data, weighted at 57.3%, and compassion and dignity follow closely at 55.2%. When families write positive reviews, they are overwhelmingly describing the feeling that staff genuinely care u2014 and that their parent is treated as a person, not a patient. Good Practice research tells us that non-verbal communication matters as much as spoken words, particularly for people with advanced dementia who may not be able to express their experiences directly. Because no specific interactions or observations are described in this report, you will need to form your own judgement on a visit. Pay attention to how staff greet your parent, whether they use preferred names, and whether they move at a pace that suits the resident rather than the shift schedule.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research / Leeds Beckett review (2026) highlights that for people with dementia, person-centred care depends on staff knowing biographical detail u2014 names, life history, preferences u2014 and that homes which embed this knowledge into daily interactions consistently show better resident wellbeing outcomes.","watch_out":"During your visit, notice whether staff use your parent's preferred name unprompted, and observe a mealtime or transition (such as moving from bedroom to lounge) to see whether staff rush residents or move at a pace that suits the individual."}

  Verified by inspectorResident testimony recorded

• Is the home responsive?

  Good

  {"found":"The Responsive domain was rated Good at the February 2019 inspection. This domain covers whether the home meets individual needs, provides meaningful activities and responds to complaints and preferences. The home lists dementia as a specialism across 20 beds, which makes individual responsiveness especially important. No specific activity programmes, examples of personalised engagement or complaint handling details are available in the published report text. As with other domains, the improvement from Requires Improvement suggests earlier gaps in responsiveness had been addressed.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Our family review data shows that 27.1% of positive reviews mention resident happiness and contentment u2014 and that happiness is almost always connected to having something meaningful to do. For a parent with dementia, group activities may not always be accessible, and Good Practice evidence consistently shows that one-to-one engagement u2014 a staff member sitting with your parent, looking through photographs, folding laundry, or listening to familiar music u2014 is as important as any organised programme. In a 20-bed home there is potential for a more personal, family-like atmosphere, but this depends entirely on whether staffing levels allow time for individual engagement beyond physical care tasks. The report gives no detail on this, so it is one of the most important things to explore directly.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett / IFF evidence review (2026) found that Montessori-based and occupation-focused approaches u2014 including everyday tasks like folding, sorting and simple cooking u2014 are among the most effective ways to support engagement and reduce distress in people with moderate to advanced dementia.","watch_out":"Ask the home: if your parent cannot join a group activity u2014 because they are having a difficult day, or because their dementia has progressed u2014 what would a member of staff do to spend meaningful one-to-one time with them, and how often does that happen each week?"}

  Verified by inspector

• Is the home well-led?

  Good

  {"found":"The Well-led domain was rated Good at the February 2019 inspection, and this is the domain where the home's improvement trajectory is most significant. Moving from Requires Improvement to Good across all domains requires active management engagement, self-assessment and a willingness to change. The home has a named Registered Manager (Miss Sally-Ann Louise Radwell) and a Nominated Individual (Mr Simon James Luckhurst), giving clear lines of accountability. No specific detail about management style, governance systems, staff culture or family communication processes is available in the published report text. Notably, this inspection is now over five years old, and management continuity since 2019 is unknown.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Our family review data shows that 23.4% of positive reviews reference management and leadership u2014 families notice whether a manager is visible, whether staff seem happy, and whether their concerns are taken seriously. Good Practice evidence is clear that leadership stability is one of the strongest predictors of quality trajectory: homes with a consistent, experienced manager tend to maintain and improve standards over time. The fact that this inspection took place in early 2019 means you are working with a five-year-old snapshot. The most important leadership question to ask is not about the rating itself, but about who is in charge now, how long they have been there, and what they have done since the last inspection.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research / Leeds Beckett review (2026) identifies leadership stability and staff empowerment u2014 staff feeling able to raise concerns without fear u2014 as the two factors most consistently associated with sustained quality in care homes over time.","watch_out":"Ask the manager directly: how long have they been in post, what changes have been made to the home since the 2019 inspection, and when is the next inspection expected? Also ask whether there is a regular family forum or way for relatives to raise concerns."}

  Verified by inspector

Source: CQC inspection report →

What the evidence base says

Against the DCC Good Practice in Dementia Care standards, this home’s evidence aligns most strongly on Bosworth provides specialist support for residents with sensory impairments, dementia, and physical disabilities. The home focuses on caring for adults over 65.. Gaps or open questions remain on For those living with dementia, the home offers dedicated support designed to maintain comfort and dignity throughout each stage of the condition. — areas worth probing directly during a visit.