Wilbraham House Ltd
At a Glance
The information you need to decide whether this home warrants a closer look.
Residential homes
Staff warmth score
of reviewers answered yes
Good to know
- Registered beds35
- SpecialismsCaring for adults over 65 yrs, Caring for adults under 65 yrs, Dementia, Learning disabilities, Physical disabilities
- Last inspected2021-10-06
- Activities programmeThe food here gets particular praise from families who've been connected with the home for years. Recent refurbishment work has freshened up the environment, with residents actually being asked for their input on the changes — a nice touch that shows management thinking beyond just the practical side of things.
The Evidence
What the review data, the inspection reports, and the dementia-care evidence base tell us about this home.
What families say
Families describe how staff here really notice what's happening with residents, catching the small changes that matter. There's a sense that people are genuinely looked after, with staff who stay alert to individual needs and keep families properly informed about their loved one's wellbeing.
Based on 10 Google reviews · 0 reviews on carehome.co.uk · most recent 2026-04-10
The eight family priority themes
- Staff warmth72
- Compassion & dignity72
- Cleanliness70
- Activities & engagement60
- Food quality60
- Healthcare65
- Management & leadership75
- Resident happiness70
What inspectors found
Inspected 2021-10-06 · Report published 2021-10-06 · Inspected 6 times in the last three years
Is this home safe?
{"found":"The Safe domain was rated Good at the September 2021 inspection, representing an improvement from the previous Requires Improvement rating. The published report does not include specific detail about staffing ratios, incident logging, medicines management, or infection control practices. The Good rating indicates that inspectors were satisfied with safety arrangements at the time of the visit. No concerns or enforcement actions were recorded in relation to safety.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Good safety rating after a previous Requires Improvement is genuinely reassuring. It means inspectors looked at the same home twice and found it had addressed whatever was going wrong. That said, Good Practice research consistently finds that safety risks are highest at night, when staffing levels drop and permanent staff are most likely to be replaced by agency workers. The published findings give no detail on either of those points. Before you decide, you need to ask specifically about overnight cover. Our review data shows that families rarely think to ask about night staffing until after a problem has occurred.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence review (IFF Research and Leeds Beckett University, 2026) found that night staffing ratios and agency staff reliance are among the strongest predictors of safety incidents in care homes, yet they are among the least visible factors during a daytime inspection visit.","watch_out":"Ask the manager: how many permanent staff are on duty overnight for the 35 beds, and what was the agency usage on night shifts in the past four weeks? Request to see the actual rota, not just the template."}
Is the care effective?
{"found":"The Effective domain was rated Good at the September 2021 inspection. This domain covers training, care planning, healthcare access, nutrition, and how well the home translates knowledge into practice. The published text does not include specific examples of care plan content, dementia training records, or how GP access is arranged. The Good rating indicates inspectors were satisfied with effectiveness overall, but no supporting detail is available in the published findings.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Effectiveness in a care home with dementia as a specialism depends heavily on how well staff are trained and how frequently care plans are updated to reflect your parent's changing needs. Good Practice research (2026) found that care plans used as living documents, reviewed regularly with family input, are strongly associated with better outcomes for people with dementia. The inspection tells us the home met the standard, but you will need to ask directly about training content and how often your parent's plan would be reviewed. Food quality is also part of this domain: in our review data, 20.9% of positive family reviews specifically mention meals as a marker of genuine care.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence review found that dementia-specific training which goes beyond basic awareness, covering communication techniques, behaviour understanding, and person-centred approaches, significantly improves day-to-day care quality and reduces distress for residents.","watch_out":"Ask the manager: what does dementia training for care staff actually cover, how recently was it completed, and can families attend care plan reviews? Ask to see the format of a care plan (with personal details removed) so you can judge how much individual detail it contains."}
Is this home caring?
{"found":"The Caring domain was rated Good at the September 2021 inspection. This domain assesses staff warmth, dignity, respect, and whether people are supported to maintain their independence. The published report contains no direct quotes from residents or relatives and no specific inspector observations of staff interactions. The Good rating indicates inspectors did not identify concerns in this area, but the evidence base for this domain is thin in the published text.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Staff warmth is the single biggest driver of family satisfaction in our review data, mentioned by name in 57.3% of positive reviews. Compassion and dignity follow closely at 55.2%. These are things that inspectors assess, but they are also things you can observe for yourself in the first ten minutes of a visit: do staff greet your parent by their preferred name, do they make eye contact, do they move without hurry? The Good Practice research is clear that for people with dementia, non-verbal warmth, tone of voice, unhurried pace, and calm body language, matters as much as the words used. The inspection rating is encouraging, but it is no substitute for your own direct observation.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence review (2026) found that non-verbal communication, including pace, tone, and physical proximity, is often more meaningful than verbal interaction for people with advanced dementia, and that staff training in this area produces measurable improvements in resident wellbeing.","watch_out":"On your visit, watch how staff interact with residents in corridors and communal areas when they do not know you are observing. Do they greet people by name, make eye contact, and stop to listen? Ask the manager what name your parent would be known by and whether that is documented in their care plan from day one."}
Is the home responsive?
{"found":"The Responsive domain was rated Good at the September 2021 inspection. This domain covers activities, individuality, complaint handling, and end-of-life care. The published report does not include detail about the activities programme, one-to-one engagement, or how the home tailors its response to individual needs and preferences. The Good rating indicates inspectors were satisfied at the time of the visit, but no supporting specifics are available.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Responsiveness is about whether the home actually adapts to your parent, rather than expecting your parent to fit the home's routine. In our review data, resident happiness accounts for 27.1% of positive family reviews, and activities for 21.4%. Good Practice research (2026) highlights that group activities alone are insufficient for people with advanced dementia, who benefit most from one-to-one engagement and the continuity of familiar everyday tasks. The home's published findings give no detail on whether one-to-one activity provision exists. This is a critical question to ask, particularly if your parent is unlikely to join group sessions.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence review found that Montessori-based and household-continuity approaches, where people engage in familiar, purposeful tasks rather than structured group activities, significantly reduce agitation and increase positive engagement in people living with dementia.","watch_out":"Ask the activities coordinator (or the manager if there is no dedicated coordinator): if my parent cannot or does not want to join a group session, what happens? Who spends time with them individually, for how long, and how is that recorded? Ask to see the activity records for the past two weeks, not just the planned schedule."}
Is the home well-led?
{"found":"The Well-led domain was rated Good at the September 2021 inspection, following a previous Requires Improvement rating. The registered manager, Ms Tracy Hodgson, is also the nominated individual, which means she holds direct personal responsibility for the quality and safety of the home. The published text does not include detail about management culture, staff feedback mechanisms, or governance systems. The improvement from Requires Improvement to Good in this domain is a meaningful indicator of progress.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Good Practice research (2026) is consistent on one point: leadership stability is the strongest predictor of quality trajectory in a care home. A manager who has turned the home from Requires Improvement to Good across all five domains deserves real credit. The fact that Ms Hodgson holds both the registered manager and nominated individual roles suggests close personal investment in the home's performance. Our review data shows that communication with families accounts for 11.5% of positive reviews, and visible management is mentioned frequently. The key question now is whether that leadership is stable and whether the culture it has built can sustain itself.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence review (2026) found that homes where staff feel able to raise concerns without fear of blame, and where managers are visible and approachable on the floor, consistently outperform homes with more hierarchical or distant leadership on resident wellbeing measures.","watch_out":"Ask how long Ms Hodgson has been in post and whether she plans to stay. Ask staff you encounter on your visit whether they feel comfortable raising a concern with the manager. Their body language and hesitation will tell you as much as their answer."}
Source: CQC inspection report →
What the evidence base says
Against the DCC Good Practice in Dementia Care standards, this home’s evidence aligns most strongly on The home cares for adults both under and over 65 with a range of needs including physical disabilities and learning disabilities. They've shown flexibility in taking emergency respite residents when families are in crisis, maintaining consistent care standards even at short notice.. Gaps or open questions remain on Dementia care forms a key part of what they do here, with staff who understand how to support both residents and families through the progression of memory loss. The structured activity programme helps residents stay engaged while giving families chances to be involved in their loved one's daily life. — areas worth probing directly during a visit.
The DCC Verdict
Our editorial view, built from the three lenses: what families tell us, what inspectors record, and how the home sits against good dementia-care practice.
DCC Family Score
Wilbraham House has improved from Requires Improvement to Good across all five inspection domains, which is a meaningful and positive step. However, the published inspection text is limited in specific detail, so many scores reflect the rating itself rather than rich, observed evidence.
Homes in West Midlands typically score 68–82.The three-lens summary
What families tell us
Families describe how staff here really notice what's happening with residents, catching the small changes that matter. There's a sense that people are genuinely looked after, with staff who stay alert to individual needs and keep families properly informed about their loved one's wellbeing.
What inspectors have recorded
The management team has brought in positive changes recently that families have noticed and appreciated. What stands out is how staff handle the hardest times — several families have shared how supported they felt during end-of-life care, with staff showing real compassion when it mattered most.
How it sits against good practice
Sometimes you just need to know that a place will be there when things get tough — Wilbraham House seems to be that kind of home.
Worth a visit
Wilbraham House on Church Street, Stoke-on-Trent, was rated Good across all five inspection domains at its September 2021 inspection. This is a significant improvement from a previous rating of Requires Improvement and indicates that inspectors found the home had made real progress across safety, care quality, management, and responsiveness. The home supports up to 35 people and holds specialisms in dementia, learning disabilities, and physical disabilities, meaning it caters for a broad and complex range of needs. The registered manager, Ms Tracy Hodgson, also holds the nominated individual role, which points to close personal accountability for how the home is run. The main uncertainty here is that the published inspection report contains very limited specific detail. There are no recorded quotes from residents or relatives, no inspector observations of daily life, and no figures for staffing ratios or activity provision. A Good rating tells you the home met the standard at the time of inspection, but it does not tell you what your parent's day-to-day experience will actually feel like. Before you decide, visit at a mealtime or during an activity session, ask to see last week's actual staffing rota (not just the template), and find out directly from the manager how they communicate with families when something changes.
The three questions to ask when you visitSave this home. Compare it against your shortlist.
Let our analysis show you how Wilbraham House Ltd measures up against the other homes you’re considering. Free account.
In Their Own Words
How Wilbraham House Ltd describes itself — collected from its own website. DCC has not edited or independently verified the content in this tab.
Where thoughtful care meets dignity through life's toughest moments
Dedicated residential home Support in Stoke On Trent
When families face difficult transitions, finding the right support matters deeply. Wilbraham House in Stoke On Trent brings together experienced staff who understand what residents and their loved ones really need. The home specialises in dementia care alongside support for physical and learning disabilities, creating a place where different care needs are met with genuine understanding.
Who they care for
The home cares for adults both under and over 65 with a range of needs including physical disabilities and learning disabilities. They've shown flexibility in taking emergency respite residents when families are in crisis, maintaining consistent care standards even at short notice.
Dementia care forms a key part of what they do here, with staff who understand how to support both residents and families through the progression of memory loss. The structured activity programme helps residents stay engaged while giving families chances to be involved in their loved one's daily life.
Management & ethos
The management team has brought in positive changes recently that families have noticed and appreciated. What stands out is how staff handle the hardest times — several families have shared how supported they felt during end-of-life care, with staff showing real compassion when it mattered most.
The home & environment
The food here gets particular praise from families who've been connected with the home for years. Recent refurbishment work has freshened up the environment, with residents actually being asked for their input on the changes — a nice touch that shows management thinking beyond just the practical side of things.
“Sometimes you just need to know that a place will be there when things get tough — Wilbraham House seems to be that kind of home.”
DCC does not edit or curate content in this tab. For independently curated information, see The Evidence and DCC Verdict.
