Priory Grange Care Home
At a Glance
The information you need to decide whether this home warrants a closer look.
Residential homes
Staff warmth score
of reviewers answered yes
Good to know
- Registered beds41
- SpecialismsCaring for adults over 65 yrs, Dementia
- Last inspected2023-04-28
- Activities programmeThe home is generally described as clean and well-maintained, with satisfactory meals provided. Some feel the building creates a homely atmosphere, though others suggest the décor could benefit from updating.
The Evidence
What the review data, the inspection reports, and the dementia-care evidence base tell us about this home.
What families say
Many families speak warmly about how staff interact with residents, describing them as caring and responsive. The home runs various activities that residents can join, and several people mention that their relatives settled in well after the initial adjustment period.
Based on 8 Google reviews · 0 reviews on carehome.co.uk · most recent 2026-04-10
The eight family priority themes
- Staff warmth72
- Compassion & dignity72
- Cleanliness70
- Activities & engagement62
- Food quality60
- Healthcare65
- Management & leadership75
- Resident happiness68
What inspectors found
Inspected 2023-04-28 · Report published 2023-04-28 · Inspected 5 times in the last three years
Is this home safe?
{"found":"The Safe domain was rated Good at the April 2023 inspection. This covers staffing levels, medicines management, infection control, and the physical safety of the premises. The home improved from a previous Requires Improvement rating, which suggests that whatever concerns existed before were identified and resolved to the inspector's satisfaction. No specific observations about falls, medicines errors, or staffing ratios are reproduced in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Good rating for safety is an important baseline, particularly for a home supporting people with dementia, who are at higher risk of falls, wandering, and medication-related problems. However, our Good Practice evidence base highlights that night staffing is where safety most often slips, and the published text gives no detail on overnight cover for 41 residents. Similarly, heavy reliance on agency staff can undermine the consistency that matters most for people living with dementia. The improvement from Requires Improvement is genuinely encouraging, but you should verify the detail directly with the manager before making a decision.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research and Leeds Beckett University rapid evidence review found that night staffing ratios and agency staff reliance are among the strongest predictors of safety incidents in residential dementia care. A Good rating on inspection does not always capture night-time practice in detail.","watch_out":"Ask the manager to show you the actual staffing rota for the past two weeks, not a template. Count the number of permanent versus agency staff on night shifts, and ask what the minimum overnight staffing level is for 41 residents."}
Is the care effective?
{"found":"The Effective domain was rated Good. This covers training, care planning, healthcare access, nutrition, and how well the home acts on assessment information. The home specialises in dementia care, so inspectors would have considered whether staff have the skills and knowledge to support people at different stages of dementia. No specific detail about training content, care plan quality, GP visiting arrangements, or food provision is reproduced in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"For a home specialising in dementia care, the Effective rating matters because it reflects whether staff genuinely understand how dementia changes the way your parent communicates, eats, moves, and experiences the world around them. Our Good Practice evidence identifies care plans as living documents that should be updated as needs change, not filed and forgotten. The published inspection does not confirm how often care plans are reviewed or whether families are routinely involved in those reviews. Food quality is also worth investigating directly: in our review data, food is mentioned in 20.9% of the most positive family reviews, and mealtimes are often the clearest window into how much a home really knows its residents as individuals.","evidence_base":"The rapid evidence review found that dementia-specific training, particularly in non-verbal communication and behaviour as communication, significantly improves care outcomes. General care training alone is not sufficient for a dementia-specialist setting.","watch_out":"Ask to see the dementia-specific training record for two or three members of the regular care team. Find out when your parent's care plan would first be written and reviewed, and whether you would be invited to contribute to it."}
Is this home caring?
{"found":"The Caring domain was rated Good. This is the domain most closely aligned with what families tell us they care about most: warmth, dignity, respect, and unhurried interactions. Inspectors judge this domain by observation, by speaking with residents, and by reviewing how the home protects privacy and supports independence. The home's improvement from Requires Improvement to Good suggests that any previous concerns in this area have been addressed. No direct inspector observations or resident or relative quotes are reproduced in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Staff warmth is the single biggest driver of positive family reviews in our data, mentioned in 57.3% of positive responses, and compassion and dignity follow closely at 55.2%. A Good rating for Caring is therefore the most significant single signal this inspection provides. What you cannot confirm from the published text alone is whether the warmth inspectors observed was consistent across all staff and all times of day, including evenings and weekends. On a visit, watch for how staff greet your parent at the door, whether they use preferred names without prompting, and whether conversations feel unhurried or transactional.","evidence_base":"The Good Practice evidence base confirms that non-verbal communication matters as much as verbal for people with advanced dementia. Staff who crouch to eye level, maintain calm eye contact, and touch reassuringly produce measurably better wellbeing outcomes than those who rely solely on spoken instruction.","watch_out":"Arrive unannounced for a second visit if possible, and spend 15 minutes in a communal area. Notice whether staff passing through acknowledge residents by name and make eye contact, or move through the space without engaging."}
Is the home responsive?
{"found":"The Responsive domain was rated Good. This covers activities, individual engagement, response to complaints, and end-of-life care. For a dementia-specialist home, responsiveness includes whether the home adapts its routines and environment to each person's needs and history, rather than offering a one-size-fits-all programme. No specific activities, individual engagement examples, or complaint-handling details are reproduced in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"In our review data, 27.1% of the most positive family reviews mention resident happiness and engagement specifically, and 21.4% mention a varied activity programme. A Good rating for Responsive is encouraging, but the detail behind it matters enormously for people with dementia. Our Good Practice evidence highlights that individual, one-to-one engagement, not just group activities, is what makes a real difference for people who can no longer participate in communal sessions. Ask specifically what would happen on a typical afternoon if your parent did not want to join a group or was too tired. The answer will tell you a great deal about how the home understands dementia.","evidence_base":"The rapid evidence review found that Montessori-based and individual activity approaches, including familiar household tasks and sensory engagement, produce significantly better wellbeing and reduced agitation compared with group-only activity programmes in dementia care settings.","watch_out":"Ask the activities coordinator to describe what happened yesterday for a resident who did not join any group sessions. A specific, unhesitating answer suggests genuine individual engagement. A vague answer suggests the programme relies heavily on groups."}
Is the home well-led?
{"found":"The Well-led domain was rated Good, and the home has a named registered manager and a nominated individual recorded at the time of inspection. The improvement from a previous Requires Improvement rating across all five domains is the clearest evidence of effective leadership, as sustained improvement requires a manager who identifies problems, acts on them, and maintains change over time. No specific detail about management style, staff culture, governance processes, or family communication is reproduced in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Our Good Practice evidence identifies leadership stability as one of the strongest predictors of ongoing care quality. Knowing that a named manager is in post is a positive sign, but manager tenure matters too: a recently appointed manager inherits a culture they did not build. In our review data, 23.4% of positive family reviews specifically mention management visibility and approachability, and 11.5% mention good communication with families. The improvement trajectory here is genuinely encouraging, but ask how long the current manager has been in post and how the home typically contacts families when something changes in their parent's condition.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research rapid evidence review found that homes where frontline staff feel confident to raise concerns without fear of reprisal consistently outperform peers on care quality measures. Bottom-up empowerment, not just top-down governance, is a reliable marker of a well-led service.","watch_out":"Ask the manager directly: how long have you been in this role, and what is the one thing you changed most recently to improve care here? A specific, confident answer rooted in a real example is a strong signal. A general answer about commitment to quality is not."}
Source: CQC inspection report →
What the evidence base says
Against the DCC Good Practice in Dementia Care standards, this home’s evidence aligns most strongly on The home provides care for people with dementia and adults over 65.. Gaps or open questions remain on While the home accepts residents with dementia and some families report positive experiences, one detailed account described inadequate support leading to rapid decline. This highlights the importance of asking specific questions about dementia care approaches during your visit. — areas worth probing directly during a visit.
The DCC Verdict
Our editorial view, built from the three lenses: what families tell us, what inspectors record, and how the home sits against good dementia-care practice.
DCC Family Score
Priory Grange Care Home scored 72 out of 100, reflecting a solid Good rating across all five inspection domains and a meaningful improvement from its previous Requires Improvement rating. The score is held back by limited specific detail in the published inspection text, meaning several areas cannot be independently verified from the report alone.
Homes in Yorkshire & Humberside typically score 68–82.The three-lens summary
What families tell us
Many families speak warmly about how staff interact with residents, describing them as caring and responsive. The home runs various activities that residents can join, and several people mention that their relatives settled in well after the initial adjustment period.
What inspectors have recorded
Staff are often praised for their attentiveness and presence throughout the home. However, one family's experience raised serious concerns about isolation and care standards, particularly for someone with dementia, which resulted in health complications.
How it sits against good practice
With such varying experiences reported, taking time to visit and asking detailed questions about care practices will help you make the best decision for your family.
Worth a visit
Priory Grange Care Home Limited, on Hessle Road in Hull, was rated Good across all five inspection domains at its April 2023 inspection. This is a meaningful result because the home had previously been rated Requires Improvement, meaning inspectors found sustained, real improvement across safety, staffing, care quality, activities, and leadership. The home supports 41 residents, specialising in dementia care and general residential care for adults over 65, and is run by a named registered manager. The main limitation for families is that only a brief published summary is available, rather than a full detailed narrative. This means the Good ratings are confirmed but the specific evidence behind them, such as staffing ratios, activity descriptions, food quality, and family communication arrangements, cannot be independently verified from the text alone. On a visit, ask to see last week's actual staffing rota, ask how many staff are on the dementia unit after 8pm, and spend time in a communal area to observe how staff interact with your parent's potential neighbours.
The three questions to ask when you visitSave this home. Compare it against your shortlist.
Let our analysis show you how Priory Grange Care Home measures up against the other homes you’re considering. Free account.
In Their Own Words
How Priory Grange Care Home describes itself — collected from its own website. DCC has not edited or independently verified the content in this tab.
Finding the right balance between care and comfort in Hull
Priory Grange Care Home Limited – Your Trusted residential home
Choosing dementia care involves weighing many factors, and Priory Grange Care Home in Hull presents a mixed picture. The home cares for adults over 65, with several families praising the caring nature of staff and the effort put into activities. However, some concerns have been raised about care standards that families should explore further.
Who they care for
The home provides care for people with dementia and adults over 65.
While the home accepts residents with dementia and some families report positive experiences, one detailed account described inadequate support leading to rapid decline. This highlights the importance of asking specific questions about dementia care approaches during your visit.
Management & ethos
Staff are often praised for their attentiveness and presence throughout the home. However, one family's experience raised serious concerns about isolation and care standards, particularly for someone with dementia, which resulted in health complications.
The home & environment
The home is generally described as clean and well-maintained, with satisfactory meals provided. Some feel the building creates a homely atmosphere, though others suggest the décor could benefit from updating.
“With such varying experiences reported, taking time to visit and asking detailed questions about care practices will help you make the best decision for your family.”
DCC does not edit or curate content in this tab. For independently curated information, see The Evidence and DCC Verdict.












