MHA Glen Rosa – Residential & Dementia Care Home
At a Glance
The information you need to decide whether this home warrants a closer look.
Residential homes
Staff warmth score
of reviewers answered yes
Good to know
- Registered beds47
- SpecialismsCaring for adults over 65 yrs, Dementia
- Last inspected2017-11-14
- Activities programmeThe home keeps things clean and bright throughout, with different activities happening in various spaces. They've even arranged visits from therapy animals — including llamas and alpacas — which brings something different to residents' days.
- Visit Website
The Evidence
What the review data, the inspection reports, and the dementia-care evidence base tell us about this home.
What families say
Visitors have noticed how relaxed residents seem when chatting with staff. There's a real sense that the team takes time to connect with everyone who lives here.
Based on 9 Google reviews · 0 reviews on carehome.co.uk · most recent 2026-04-10
The eight family priority themes
- Staff warmth55
- Compassion & dignity60
- Cleanliness55
- Activities & engagement50
- Food quality50
- Healthcare50
- Management & leadership65
- Resident happiness55
What inspectors found
Inspected 2017-11-14 · Report published 2017-11-14 · Inspected 1 times in the last three years
Is this home safe?
{"found":"The Safe domain was rated Requires Improvement at the October 2017 inspection. This means inspectors found at least one area where the home was not fully meeting the expected standard for keeping people safe. The published summary does not detail what the specific concerns were. A monitoring review in July 2023 did not trigger a reassessment of the rating, but no new full inspection has taken place since 2017.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Requires Improvement in Safe is the finding that will concern most families most immediately, and rightly so. Safety is the baseline: everything else matters less if your mum or dad is at risk. Our family review data shows that attentive, responsive staffing is one of the clearest signals families look for, and it is frequently linked to how safe a home feels day to day. The Good Practice evidence from IFF Research and Leeds Beckett University identifies night staffing as the period when safety is most likely to slip, particularly in homes with high dementia prevalence. Because the inspection is now seven years old, you cannot rely on it to tell you whether the Requires Improvement finding was resolved. You need to ask the home directly.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review found that agency staff reliance and thin night-time staffing were consistently associated with poorer safety outcomes in care homes supporting people with dementia. These are the two questions most worth pressing on when you visit.","watch_out":"Ask the manager specifically: what did the 2017 inspection identify as the reason for the Requires Improvement in Safe, and what evidence can they show you that it has been addressed? Then ask to see last month's actual night-shift rota, not a template, and count how many permanent staff were on duty overnight."}
Is the care effective?
{"found":"The Effective domain was rated Good at the October 2017 inspection. This domain covers whether staff have the right training, whether care plans reflect individual needs, whether people have access to healthcare, and whether nutrition and hydration are managed well. No specific detail about what inspectors observed is available in the published summary. Methodist Homes, the organisation running the home, has published dementia care frameworks nationally, which may be relevant context.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Good rating in Effective is encouraging, but without the detail of what inspectors actually found it is hard to know what that Good is based on. Our family review data shows that food quality (mentioned in 20.9% of positive reviews) and dementia-specific care (12.7%) are two of the things families most often single out as evidence that a home genuinely knows what it is doing. The Good Practice evidence base is clear that care plans should be living documents, updated after any significant change and reviewed at least monthly for people with advancing dementia. Ask the home to show you a sample care plan structure and to explain how families are kept involved.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research rapid evidence review found that regular, documented GP access and structured dementia training for all staff, not just senior carers, were the two strongest predictors of good outcomes in the Effective domain across the 61 studies reviewed.","watch_out":"Ask to see the dementia training log for permanent care staff. You want to know when each person last completed dementia-specific training, what the training covered, and whether it goes beyond an online awareness module to include communication techniques for people who have lost verbal language."}
Is this home caring?
{"found":"The Caring domain was rated Good at the October 2017 inspection. This domain covers how staff treat people: whether they are kind, whether they respect privacy and dignity, and whether they support people's independence. No specific inspector observations, quotes from residents, or family testimony are available in the published summary. The absence of detail makes it impossible to say what specifically was seen.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Staff warmth is the single most important theme in our family review data, mentioned by name in 57.3% of positive reviews, and compassion and dignity follow closely at 55.2%. A Good rating here is a positive signal, but without the detail of what inspectors observed you need to form your own view on a visit. The Good Practice evidence is consistent on one point: the quality of non-verbal communication matters as much as words, particularly for people with advancing dementia who may no longer be able to express preferences verbally. Watch how staff behave in corridor interactions and at mealtimes, not just in formal introductions.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett evidence review found that person-led care requires staff to know each individual's history, preferences, and communication style. Homes that maintained detailed personal life-history records alongside care plans showed better outcomes on dignity and wellbeing measures.","watch_out":"When you visit, listen for whether staff address your parent by their preferred name without being prompted, and watch whether they make eye contact and pause to listen before moving on. These small, unhurried interactions are the most reliable signal of a caring culture."}
Is the home responsive?
{"found":"The Responsive domain was rated Good at the October 2017 inspection. This domain covers whether the home tailors care to individual needs, whether activities are meaningful and varied, whether complaints are handled well, and whether end-of-life care is planned appropriately. As with the other domains, no specific detail from the inspection is available in the published summary.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Resident happiness is one of the most frequently mentioned themes in our review data (27.1% of positive reviews), and activities and engagement account for 21.4%. For someone living with dementia, a Good in Responsive means the home is at least meeting the standard on paper, but the evidence base is clear that group activities alone are not enough: people with more advanced dementia need one-to-one engagement tailored to what they could do before the illness progressed. Ask specifically about this because it is the area where there is most gap between what a rota says and what actually happens on a quiet Tuesday afternoon.","evidence_base":"The IFF Research rapid evidence review found that Montessori-based approaches and the use of familiar everyday household tasks, such as folding, sorting, and simple cooking, were among the most effective activity interventions for people with moderate to advanced dementia, and that these required individual planning rather than group programming.","watch_out":"Ask the activities coordinator to describe what would happen on a day when your parent does not want to join a group session. What is the one-to-one offer? Who delivers it, and how is it recorded in the care plan?"}
Is the home well-led?
{"found":"The Well-led domain was rated Good at the October 2017 inspection. The home has a named registered manager (Mr Adam Joseph Carling) and a nominated individual (Mrs Amanda Weir), both recorded at the time of inspection. Methodist Homes is the operating organisation. No detail is available about what inspectors found in terms of culture, staff empowerment, governance processes, or quality monitoring. It is also not known whether the same manager is still in post.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Management quality accounted for 23.4% of the positive signals in our family review data. Good leadership is not just about paperwork: it is about whether the manager is visible on the floor, whether staff feel able to raise concerns, and whether the home learns and improves when things go wrong. The Good Practice evidence is consistent that leadership stability is one of the strongest predictors of quality over time. Given that the inspection is from 2017, manager continuity is one of the first things worth checking: a home that has had several managers since then is a different proposition from one with the same stable leader.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review found that leadership stability, defined as the same registered manager in post for more than two years, was one of the strongest single predictors of sustained quality ratings across multiple inspection cycles.","watch_out":"Ask how long the current registered manager has been in post, whether they are present on site most weekdays, and what the home did differently after the 2017 Requires Improvement in Safe. A manager confident in their culture will answer these questions specifically, not in generalities."}
Source: CQC inspection report →
What the evidence base says
Against the DCC Good Practice in Dementia Care standards, this home’s evidence aligns most strongly on The home cares for adults over 65 and has experience supporting people with dementia.. Gaps or open questions remain on While Glen Rosa & Kitwood House welcomes residents with dementia, you'll want to ask about their specific approaches and staff training when you visit. — areas worth probing directly during a visit.
The DCC Verdict
Our editorial view, built from the three lenses: what families tell us, what inspectors record, and how the home sits against good dementia-care practice.
DCC Family Score
The overall Good rating lifts confidence in most areas, but the Requires Improvement in Safe is a real concern that pulls the family score down. The inspection is also from October 2017, which means the findings are now more than seven years old and should be treated as background context rather than a current picture.
Homes in Yorkshire & Humberside typically score 68–82.The three-lens summary
What families tell us
Visitors have noticed how relaxed residents seem when chatting with staff. There's a real sense that the team takes time to connect with everyone who lives here.
What inspectors have recorded
How it sits against good practice
Sometimes the basics matter most — a caring team in a pleasant environment can make all the difference.
Worth a visit
Glen Rosa and Kitwood House on Grove Road in Ilkley received an overall Good rating at its last inspection, carried out in October 2017 and published in November 2017. Four of the five domains, Effective, Caring, Responsive, and Well-led, were all rated Good. The home is registered to support up to 47 people, including those living with dementia, and is run by Methodist Homes, one of the larger not-for-profit care providers in the UK. The one significant finding that stands out is a Requires Improvement rating in the Safe domain. This means inspectors identified something that needed to change to protect residents, though the published summary does not spell out what specifically was found. Equally important: this inspection is from 2017, making it over seven years old. A review was carried out in July 2023 and found no evidence requiring a reassessment of the rating, but that is not the same as a fresh inspection. Before making a decision, visit the home in person, ask the manager what changed after the 2017 Safe finding and how the home has been reviewed since, and request sight of any more recent quality reports or survey results.
The three questions to ask when you visitSave this home. Compare it against your shortlist.
Let our analysis show you how MHA Glen Rosa – Residential & Dementia Care Home measures up against the other homes you’re considering. Free account.
In Their Own Words
How MHA Glen Rosa – Residential & Dementia Care Home describes itself — collected from its own website. DCC has not edited or independently verified the content in this tab.
Where staff genuinely care and residents feel relaxed
Dedicated residential home Support in Ilkley
When you visit Glen Rosa & Kitwood House in Ilkley, you'll notice something that matters — the staff here clearly enjoy what they do. This care home provides residential support for people over 65, including those living with dementia, in premises that feel bright and well-looked after.
Who they care for
The home cares for adults over 65 and has experience supporting people with dementia.
While Glen Rosa & Kitwood House welcomes residents with dementia, you'll want to ask about their specific approaches and staff training when you visit.
The home & environment
The home keeps things clean and bright throughout, with different activities happening in various spaces. They've even arranged visits from therapy animals — including llamas and alpacas — which brings something different to residents' days.
“Sometimes the basics matter most — a caring team in a pleasant environment can make all the difference.”
DCC does not edit or curate content in this tab. For independently curated information, see The Evidence and DCC Verdict.













