Rosedale Centre
At a Glance
The information you need to decide whether this home warrants a closer look.
Residential homes
Staff warmth score
of reviewers answered yes
Good to know
- Registered beds44
- SpecialismsCaring for adults over 65 yrs, Caring for adults under 65 yrs, Dementia, Mental health conditions, Physical disabilities, Sensory impairment
- Last inspected2022-11-16
- Activities programmeThe home-cooked meals get consistent praise for both taste and presentation — proper food that helps with recovery. Rooms have been described as comfortable, though some residents would appreciate more control over their environment.
- Visit Website
The Evidence
What the review data, the inspection reports, and the dementia-care evidence base tell us about this home.
What families say
When residents connect well with staff here, families describe real warmth and patience during recovery. The atmosphere can feel supportive and encouraging, particularly for those working hard to regain mobility after hospital stays.
Based on 20 Google reviews · 0 reviews on carehome.co.uk · most recent 2026-04-10
The eight family priority themes
- Staff warmth72
- Compassion & dignity72
- Cleanliness70
- Activities & engagement62
- Food quality62
- Healthcare68
- Management & leadership74
- Resident happiness68
What inspectors found
Inspected 2022-11-16 · Report published 2022-11-16 · Inspected 5 times in the last three years
Is this home safe?
{"found":"The Safe domain was rated Good at the November 2022 inspection, an improvement from the previous Requires Improvement rating. This domain covers staffing levels, medicines management, infection control, and the home's response to accidents and incidents. The published report does not reproduce specific findings such as staffing ratios, falls data, or medicines audit results. The improvement from the previous rating suggests that concerns identified earlier had been addressed by the time of this inspection.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"A Good safety rating after a previous Requires Improvement is genuinely encouraging. It tells you that inspectors found the home had resolved whatever gaps existed before. However, the Good Practice evidence base (IFF Research and Leeds Beckett University, 2026) consistently identifies night staffing as the area where safety problems are most likely to emerge in care homes, and the published report gives no detail on night staffing numbers for Rosedale's 44 beds. The inspection's Safe domain also covers medicines, which matters enormously if your parent takes multiple regular medications. Because the published summary lacks specifics, you cannot rely on the rating alone to answer those practical questions.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that agency staff reliance and thin night staffing ratios are among the strongest predictors of safety incidents in residential care. A Good rating does not confirm those risks are absent; it confirms they met the standard at the time of inspection.","watch_out":"Ask the manager to show you the actual staffing rota for last week, not the template. Count how many permanent staff versus agency staff covered the night shifts, and confirm the ratio of carers to residents after 10pm."}
Is the care effective?
{"found":"The Effective domain was rated Good, covering care planning, staff training, healthcare access, and nutritional support. The home lists dementia as a specialism, which means inspectors would have assessed whether dementia-specific training and care planning were in place. The published summary does not describe specific training content, care plan formats, GP access arrangements, or examples of health monitoring. The Good rating indicates the inspectors were satisfied with the overall standard.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Effectiveness in a care home is about whether staff actually know your parent as an individual and whether the right healthcare support is in place. Our family review data shows that healthcare quality influences 20.2% of positive family reviews, and food quality influences 20.9%. Neither is covered in specific detail in this inspection summary. The Good Practice evidence base (2026) identifies care plans as living documents that should be reviewed at least monthly and updated whenever your parent's needs change. Whether that is happening here cannot be confirmed from the published text alone.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that care homes where staff receive structured, dementia-specific training (including non-verbal communication and behaviour-as-communication approaches) produce significantly better outcomes for people living with dementia than homes where training is generic.","watch_out":"Ask the manager to show you a sample care plan (anonymised if necessary) and explain how often it is reviewed, who contributes to it, and how family members are invited to participate in reviews."}
Is this home caring?
{"found":"The Caring domain was rated Good, which is the domain most directly concerned with staff warmth, dignity, and respect. Inspectors assess whether staff know residents as individuals, address them by their preferred names, support their independence, and respond to distress appropriately. The published summary does not include direct quotes from residents or relatives, nor any specific inspector observations of staff interactions. The Good rating indicates that the standard was met across the home at the time of inspection.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Staff warmth is the single biggest driver of family satisfaction in our review data, appearing in 57.3% of positive Google reviews across 5,409 UK care homes. Compassion and dignity together account for a further 55.2%. That means how staff interact with your parent day to day matters more to families than almost any other factor. The published inspection gives you a rating but not the texture behind it. On a visit, the most reliable signals are small ones: does a staff member stop what they are doing to acknowledge your parent in the corridor? Do they use their preferred name without being prompted? Are they unhurried?","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that non-verbal communication, including eye contact, tone, and pace, matters as much as spoken words for people with advanced dementia, and that staff who demonstrate this in practice are typically those who have received structured person-centred care training.","watch_out":"During your visit, sit quietly in a communal area for 15 minutes and observe whether staff initiate conversation with residents or only interact when providing a task. Note whether interactions feel unhurried and whether staff use residents' preferred names."}
Is the home responsive?
{"found":"The Responsive domain was rated Good, covering activities, individual engagement, and end-of-life care planning. The home offers care for people with dementia, mental health conditions, physical disabilities, and sensory impairments, meaning the activity and engagement offer needs to be appropriately tailored. The published summary does not describe specific activities, individual engagement approaches, or end-of-life planning arrangements. The Good rating indicates inspectors found the standard was met.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Our family review data shows that activities and engagement influence 21.4% of positive reviews, and resident happiness overall influences 27.1%. The Good Practice evidence base (2026) specifically highlights the importance of one-to-one activities for people who cannot or will not participate in group settings, which is a common situation for people with moderate to advanced dementia. A timetable of group activities on the wall tells you very little about what actually happens for your parent on a Tuesday afternoon if they prefer to stay in their room. That is the gap this rating cannot fill on its own.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that Montessori-based and household-task approaches (folding laundry, setting a table, tending plants) produce better engagement and reduced distress in people with dementia than structured group activities alone, particularly for those with communication difficulties.","watch_out":"Ask the activities coordinator to show you the actual engagement records for the past month, not the planned schedule. Ask specifically what one-to-one engagement looks like for a resident who does not join group activities on a given day."}
Is the home well-led?
{"found":"The Well-led domain was rated Good, an improvement from the previous inspection when the home was rated Requires Improvement. The home has a named registered manager, Mrs Kelly-Marie Bloomfield, and a named nominated individual, Mrs Rebecca Gray, both of which are recorded by the regulator. The home is operated by Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, a local authority provider. The published summary does not describe the management culture, staff satisfaction, governance processes, or how the home uses feedback from residents and families. The improved rating suggests the governance gaps identified previously had been addressed.","quotes":[],"family_meaning":"Management stability is one of the strongest predictors of care quality over time. Our family review data shows that visible, approachable management influences 23.4% of positive reviews. Communication with families influences a further 11.5%. The Good Practice evidence base (2026) identifies leadership stability and the ability of frontline staff to speak up without fear as the two most important cultural markers of a well-run home. The improvement from Requires Improvement is a positive signal, but it is worth understanding what changed and whether those changes have been embedded. A council-run home also typically has an additional layer of governance through the local authority, which can be a reassurance.","evidence_base":"The Leeds Beckett rapid evidence review (2026) found that homes where the registered manager had been in post for more than two years showed consistently better outcomes across all quality domains than homes experiencing frequent management turnover.","watch_out":"Ask the manager directly how long she has been in post, what the main changes were since the previous inspection, and how the home communicates with families when something changes with their parent's health or wellbeing, including what happens out of hours."}
Source: CQC inspection report →
What the evidence base says
Against the DCC Good Practice in Dementia Care standards, this home’s evidence aligns most strongly on The centre cares for adults of all ages with physical disabilities, sensory impairments, mental health conditions and dementia. Their rehabilitation programme includes physiotherapy support, with several residents achieving measurable mobility improvements during their stay.. Gaps or open questions remain on For residents with dementia, the centre provides specialist support alongside their rehabilitation services. Families considering the home should discuss assessment procedures thoroughly to ensure their relative's needs are fully understood. — areas worth probing directly during a visit.
The DCC Verdict
Our editorial view, built from the three lenses: what families tell us, what inspectors record, and how the home sits against good dementia-care practice.
DCC Family Score
Rosedale Centre scores 71 out of 100, reflecting a genuine improvement from its previous Requires Improvement rating to a full Good across all five inspection domains. The score is held back by limited specific detail in the published report, meaning several important areas for families cannot be verified from the inspection text alone.
Homes in North East typically score 68–82.The three-lens summary
What families tell us
When residents connect well with staff here, families describe real warmth and patience during recovery. The atmosphere can feel supportive and encouraging, particularly for those working hard to regain mobility after hospital stays.
What inspectors have recorded
Communication experiences vary significantly between families. While some find staff responsive and cheerful when answering questions, others have encountered gaps between care teams and management that affected their relative's assessment or care planning.
How it sits against good practice
If you're considering Rosedale Centre for rehabilitation care, it's worth asking detailed questions about their assessment process and how they'll communicate with you throughout your relative's stay.
Worth a visit
Rosedale Centre, at 122 Marske Lane, Stockton-on-Tees, was rated Good at its inspection in November 2022, with all five domains (safe, effective, caring, responsive, and well-led) receiving Good ratings. This is a meaningful improvement from a previous Requires Improvement rating, which suggests the leadership team has made real changes. The home is run by Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council and has a named registered manager and nominated individual on record, which points to a stable governance structure. The main limitation here is that the published inspection summary contains very little specific detail: no direct quotes from residents or relatives, no descriptions of staff interactions, and no specifics on food, activities, or night staffing. A Good rating tells you the inspectors were broadly satisfied, but it does not tell you what daily life actually looks like for your mum or dad. Before making a decision, visit in person during the afternoon (when activity should be at its peak), ask to see last month's actual activity records and a sample week of menus, and ask the manager directly how many permanent staff cover nights across the 44 beds.
The three questions to ask when you visitSave this home. Compare it against your shortlist.
Let our analysis show you how Rosedale Centre measures up against the other homes you’re considering. Free account.
In Their Own Words
How Rosedale Centre describes itself — collected from its own website. DCC has not edited or independently verified the content in this tab.
Rehabilitation success stories alongside questions about care consistency
Compassionate Care in Stockton-on-Tees at Rosedale Centre
Rosedale Centre in Stockton-on-Tees specialises in short-term rehabilitation, with several residents making remarkable recoveries — from wheelchair to walking frame, or regaining independence after serious health events. The centre supports people with complex needs including dementia and physical disabilities, though some families have raised concerns about assessment processes and communication that deserve careful consideration.
Who they care for
The centre cares for adults of all ages with physical disabilities, sensory impairments, mental health conditions and dementia. Their rehabilitation programme includes physiotherapy support, with several residents achieving measurable mobility improvements during their stay.
For residents with dementia, the centre provides specialist support alongside their rehabilitation services. Families considering the home should discuss assessment procedures thoroughly to ensure their relative's needs are fully understood.
Management & ethos
Communication experiences vary significantly between families. While some find staff responsive and cheerful when answering questions, others have encountered gaps between care teams and management that affected their relative's assessment or care planning.
The home & environment
The home-cooked meals get consistent praise for both taste and presentation — proper food that helps with recovery. Rooms have been described as comfortable, though some residents would appreciate more control over their environment.
“If you're considering Rosedale Centre for rehabilitation care, it's worth asking detailed questions about their assessment process and how they'll communicate with you throughout your relative's stay.”
DCC does not edit or curate content in this tab. For independently curated information, see The Evidence and DCC Verdict.
